Case Review

supreme court of the usa

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell (2003): A Landmark Supreme Court Decision on Car Accident Insurance

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell (2003): A Landmark Supreme Court Decision on Car Accident Insurance Background The case of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell involved a dispute between an insurance company and its policyholder over whether the insurance company was required to provide coverage to the policyholder after the […]

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell (2003): A Landmark Supreme Court Decision on Car Accident Insurance Read More »

blogs, Case Review, Court decisions

Miranda v. Arizona: A Landmark Case for Criminal Justice Reform

Miranda v. Arizona: A Landmark Case for Criminal Justice Reform Background Ernesto Miranda was a 23-year-old man who was arrested and interrogated by police in connection with a kidnapping and rape. Miranda was not informed of his rights, and he eventually confessed to the crimes. He was convicted and sentenced to 20-30 years in prison.

Miranda v. Arizona: A Landmark Case for Criminal Justice Reform Read More »

blogs, Case Review, Uncategorized
HasLawBook Firm Practice Area

The Impact of the USA Supreme Court Decision: Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2000) on 18 Wheeler Accident Attorneys.

The Impact of the USA Supreme Court Decision: Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2000) on 18 Wheeler Accident Attorneys. Introduction In the realm of product liability law, the Supreme Court decision in Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2000) holds significant importance. This landmark case not only addressed the issue of airbags

The Impact of the USA Supreme Court Decision: Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2000) on 18 Wheeler Accident Attorneys. Read More »

blogs, Case Review, , , ,
HasLawBook

Progressive American Insurance Company v Back on Track case Review.

Progressive American Insurance Company v. Back on Track, LLC, the Florida Second District Court of Appeal held that insurers are not required to reimburse medical providers according to the statutory schedule of maximum charges. This decision has implications for both insurers and providers, and it is likely to be followed by other courts in interpreting similar statutes in other states.
Keywords: Progressive, Back on Track, PIP, Florida, insurance, medical providers, maximum charges

Progressive American Insurance Company v Back on Track case Review. Read More »

blogs, Case Review, , , ,
Scroll to Top