legal, illegal, choose-1143114.jpg

Navigating the Legal Labyrinth: A Comprehensive Guide to the Three Types of Jurisprudence

A Comprehensive Guide to the Three Types of Jurisprudence. In this blog post i will explore the three types of jurisprudence. Firstly what is jurisprudence? In short Jurisprudence is the philosophy and theory of law. Furthermore, It’s primarily concern is answering what the law is And what it ought to be. If so, is jurisprudence divided? Yes of course, jurisprudence can be divided into three main branches. Further more this branches are called firstly, Analytical jurisprudence. secondly Normative jurisprudence thirdly Critical legal theory

HasLawBook

Progressive American Insurance Company v Back on Track case Review.

Progressive American Insurance Company v. Back on Track, LLC, the Florida Second District Court of Appeal held that insurers are not required to reimburse medical providers according to the statutory schedule of maximum charges. This decision has implications for both insurers and providers, and it is likely to be followed by other courts in interpreting similar statutes in other states.
Keywords: Progressive, Back on Track, PIP, Florida, insurance, medical providers, maximum charges

flag, ethiopia, ethiopian flag-2313972.jpg

FDRE Ethiopian Government and Oromia Regional State Government Constitutional Structure

The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE) is a federal parliamentary republic consisting of 9 regional states and 2 city administrations. The federal government is responsible for matters of national interest, such as foreign policy, defense, and currency, while the regional states are responsible for local matters, such as education, healthcare, and agriculture.

fdre flag

Ethiopian Federal Courts: A Strong Legal Foundation

Ethiopian Federal Courts: A Strong Legal Foundation read the blog and download FDRE Supreme Court Cassation Decision volume 1-24 pdf Ethiopian Federal Courts: A Strong Legal Foundation Indeed, Ethiopia is a country known for its rich history and diverse culture. Accordingly, the country has made significant strides in establishing a robust legal system to ensure …

Ethiopian Federal Courts: A Strong Legal Foundation Read More »

Miranda v. Arizona: A Landmark Case for Criminal Justice Reform

Miranda v. Arizona: A Landmark Case for Criminal Justice Reform Background Ernesto Miranda was a 23-year-old man who was arrested and interrogated by police in connection with a kidnapping and rape. Miranda was not informed of his rights, and he eventually confessed to the crimes. He was convicted and sentenced to 20-30 years in prison. …

Miranda v. Arizona: A Landmark Case for Criminal Justice Reform Read More »

HasLawBook Firm Practice Area

The Impact of the USA Supreme Court Decision: Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2000) on 18 Wheeler Accident Attorneys.

The Impact of the USA Supreme Court Decision: Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2000) on 18 Wheeler Accident Attorneys. Introduction In the realm of product liability law, the Supreme Court decision in Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2000) holds significant importance. This landmark case not only addressed the issue of airbags …

The Impact of the USA Supreme Court Decision: Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2000) on 18 Wheeler Accident Attorneys. Read More »