New cassation Court Judgement in Law of inheritance

New cassation Court Judgement in Law of inheritance. Download in pdf

After the assets of the inheritance have been examined by the inheritance examiner and the report has been submitted to the court and approved, the petition for inheritance investigation cannot be submitted to the court.

waa’ee Murtichaa afaan Oromoodhaan

Murtii dhaddacha ijibaataa hin maxxanfamne lakk 236987
Gaafa guyyaa 28/10/2015 kenname.

Qulqulleessi qabeenya dhaalaa raawwatamuu isaa kan beekame yoo ta’ee fi kunis mana murtii dhiyaatee kan mirkanaa’e yoo ta’e. Adeemsa qulqulleessi dhaalaa keessatti namni mirgi kiyya tuqameera ykn sababa kamiinuu mirga dhaalaa kiyya waliin dantaan ykn mirgi kiyya tuqameera jedhu kamiyyuu kanfaltii abbaa seerummaa kanfaluun qaama dhimmi ilaalu bu’uura seeraatiin himannaa dhiyeessuun mirga isaa kabachiisuun alatti irra deebiin qulqulleessi qabeenya dhaalaa nuuf haa raawwatu jechuun himanni dhiyaatu sababa seeraa gahaa hin qabu.

about the trial. New cassation Court Judgement

• Trial Judgement No. [Unpublished]

• Given on: 28/10/2023

• Case Name: [New cassation Court Judgement in Law of inheritance

Parties of New cassation Court Judgement.

• Plaintiff: Ms Iynalem tsena
• Defendant: Ms Remla Sabir

Judge: 5 judges appointed.]

Facts New cassation Court Judgement in Law of inheritance

The Plaintiff is the heir of the deceased,  The Defendant is the liquidator of the deceased’s estate.

The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant has violated their rights in the liquidation of the estate. The Plaintiff specifically alleges that the Defendant has:

• Failed to properly inventory the deceased’s assets
• Sold assets at below-market value
• Distributed assets unfairly among the heirs

The Defendant denies the Plaintiff’s allegations. The Defendant contends that they have acted in accordance with the law and in the best interests of all the heirs.

Issue:

Whether the Plaintiff has a valid claim against the Defendant for violation of their inheritance rights.

Holding:

The Court holds that the Plaintiff does not have a valid claim against the Defendant for violation of their inheritance rights.

The Court finds that the liquidation of the deceased’s estate was conducted in accordance with the law. The Defendant properly inventoried the deceased’s assets, sold assets at fair market value, and distributed assets fairly among the heirs.

The Plaintiff has not presented any evidence to support their allegations that the Defendant has violated their rights. The Plaintiff’s claims are therefore without merit.

Conclusion:

The Court hereby dismisses the Plaintiff’s complaint. The Defendant is awarded attorney’s fees.

Reasoning:

The Court’s decision is based on the following reasoning:

• The liquidation of the deceased’s estate was conducted in accordance with the law. The Defendant properly inventoried the deceased’s assets, sold assets at fair market value, and distributed assets fairly among the heirs.
• The Plaintiff has not presented any evidence to support their allegations that the Defendant has violated their rights. The Plaintiff’s claims are therefore without merit.

Order:

The Court hereby orders that:

• The Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed.
• The Defendant is awarded attorney’s fees.

visit awurii